SMID
Bullish signalScored 2026-09-07 Drivers: fundamentals. Moteurs : fondamentaux.
Research, not advice.
À propos
Smith-Midland Corporation
- Nom
- Smith-Midland Corporation
- Secteur
- Basic Materials
- Industrie
- Construction Materials
- Bourse
- NASDAQ
- Capitalisation
- $112.9M
- Employés
- 184
- PDG
- Ashley Smith
- Site web
- https://smithmidland.com
- Marché
- BGLBHSTCMTFEAMFFFRD
Smith-Midland Corporation, operating through its subsidiaries, specializes in the comprehensive provision of precast concrete solutions. This involves the invention, development, manufacturing, marketing, leasing, licensing, selling, and installation of these products, primarily serving the construction, highway, utilities, and agricultural industries. Among its key offerings is SlenderWall, a patented, lightweight, and energy-efficient concrete-and-steel exterior wall panel designed for building construction. The company also manufactures Sierra Wall, which serves as a sound and sight barrier along highways, as well as for residential, industrial, and commercial areas. J-J Hooks are another product, acting as highway safety barriers crucial for separating traffic lanes in construction zones or for general traffic control on roadways. Additionally, SMC provides Easi-Set precast buildings and Easi-Span expandable precast buildings, ideal for housing communication equipment, traffic control systems, and mechanical or electrical stations. Easi-Set utility vaults are available for containing equipment like cable, telephone, or traffic signals, and for underground storage; custom versions can also be provided to meet specific requirements. Other specialized products include SoftSound panels for highway noise absorption, Beach Prisms erosion control modules used in seawalls and jetties, and H2Out secondary drainage systems for exterior cladding. SMC further extends its reach by licensing its proprietary technologies across several international markets, including Canada, Australia, Belgium, Mexico, New Zealand, and Trinidad. Its products are distributed through both an in-house sales team and independent representatives. The clientele primarily consists of contractors engaged in public and private construction projects—encompassing commercial buildings, roads, airports, and municipal utilities—as well as federal, state, and local transportation authorities. Established in 1960, Smith-Midland Corporation maintains its headquarters in Midland, Virginia.
Price (1 year)
Live chart from TradingView — independent market data, as price context around the filings, not the Quorum score. EMA 50/200 and Bollinger load by default. When the exchange is known it is sent as EXCHANGE:SYMBOL; otherwise TradingView resolves the ticker best-effort.
ACHAT TOTAL: 4 000 titres (~108 040,00 $ US)
- Insiders
- SMITH ASHLEY BSmith Matthew I
- Total bought
-
$108,040
Avg buy (VWAP, 90d window) $22.34 vs last close —
- Total sold
-
—
Avg sell (VWAP, 90d window) —
Total sold sums Form 4 code S in this window. Codes F, M, A and G are left out.
- Last activity
- 2026-09-02
- Last synced
-
2026-09-08 09:54:45
Sign in to request a sync of this company's price history and timing levels.
Insider holdings as a share of total assets aren't available for this company.
Avg buy and avg sell are volume-weighted prices (sum of shares × price, divided by shares) for Form 4 rows in this 90-day window that report both figures. A comparison with last close is market context for that average, not advice.
Recent Form 4
Filings in the 90-day window for this company. Value is shares × price from the filing. Research, not advice.
| Date | Person | Side | Shares | Price | Value | Form 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-02 | Smith Matthew I | Buy · P | 2,000 | $27.15 | $54,300 | Form 4 |
| 2026-09-01 | SMITH ASHLEY B | Buy · P | 2,000 | $26.87 | $53,740 | Form 4 |
| 2018-12-07 | SMITH ASHLEY B | Buy · P | 1,275 | $7.69 | $9,805 | Form 4 |
Congressional trades
STOCK Act disclosures (90-day window)
Amounts are STOCK Act brackets as disclosed. Quorum does not turn a bracket into an exact price or a midpoint.
No STOCK Act disclosures for this company in this window.
Signal
Bullish signalScored 2026-09-07 Drivers: fundamentals. Moteurs : fondamentaux.
SMID combines exceptional financial health (liquidity score 90, fundamentals trend 85) with a credible insider cluster buy signal backed by concrete contract wins and a $100M backlog target, justifying a high conviction…
The first sentence of the analysis written for SMID on 2026-09-07 - a real excerpt, not a sample. The rest of it, the 0-100 score and the rating it produced are part of Plus. See plans.
Factor checklist — research, not advice
A check leans with a bullish reading. A cross leans against it. A dash is unavailable or mixed.
- Insider Supports a bullish reading. Open-market purchases outweigh sales
- Congress Unavailable or mixed. No purchase disclosures in the stored window
- Narrative Supports a bullish reading. Stored narrative reading is in the bullish band
- Timing Unavailable or mixed. No stored price series
- Financial indicators Supports a bullish reading. Current ratio 3.40 · operating margin 18%
Market snapshot
Financial ratios
| Metric | Trend | 2025-12-31 | 2024-12-31 | 2023-12-31 | 2022-12-31 | 2021-12-31 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Profit Margin | 27.9% | 25.5% | 17.9% | 18.9% | 28.5% | |
| Ebit Margin | 18.5% | 12.8% | 2.6% | 2.4% | 18.3% | |
| Ebitda Margin | 21.6% | 16.2% | 6.6% | 8.2% | 23.6% | |
| Operating Profit Margin | 18.2% | 12.6% | 1.9% | 1.7% | 12.2% | |
| Pretax Profit Margin | 18.2% | 12.5% | 2.2% | 1.9% | 18.0% | |
| Continuous Operations Profit Margin | 13.4% | 9.8% | 1.3% | 1.6% | 14.9% | |
| Net Profit Margin | 13.4% | 9.8% | 1.3% | 1.6% | 14.9% | |
| Bottom Line Profit Margin | 13.4% | 9.8% | 1.3% | 1.6% | 14.9% | |
| Current Ratio | 3.401 | 2.388 | 2.080 | 2.578 | 1.996 | |
| Quick Ratio | 2.918 | 1.944 | 1.759 | 2.238 | 1.791 | |
| Solvency Ratio | 0.461 | 0.394 | 0.117 | 0.174 | 0.476 | |
| Cash Ratio | 0.829 | 0.503 | 0.573 | 0.599 | 0.970 | |
| Price To Earnings Ratio | 15.398 | 30.662 | 263.333 | 136.667 | 32.414 | |
| Price To Earnings Growth Ratio | 0.245 | 0.035 | 0.000 | -1.524 | 0.176 | |
| Forward Price To Earnings Growth Ratio | 0.245 | 0.035 | 0.000 | -1.524 | 0.176 | |
| Price To Earnings Diluted Ratio | 15.398 | 30.662 | 263.333 | 136.667 | 32.414 | |
| Price To Earnings Diluted Growth Ratio | 0.245 | 0.035 | 0.000 | -1.524 | 0.176 | |
| Price To Book Ratio | 3.550 | 5.650 | 6.080 | 3.245 | 7.705 | |
| Price To Sales Ratio | 2.063 | 3.004 | 3.486 | 2.140 | 4.831 | |
| Price To Free Cash Flow Ratio | 38.844 | -225.661 | 76.301 | -11.811 | 65.080 | |
| Price To Operating Cash Flow Ratio | 13.480 | 45.718 | 26.861 | -16.937 | 26.806 | |
| Debt To Assets Ratio | 0.052 | 0.077 | 0.094 | 0.119 | 0.082 | |
| Debt To Equity Ratio | 0.084 | 0.125 | 0.169 | 0.196 | 0.137 | |
| Debt To Capital Ratio | 0.077 | 0.111 | 0.145 | 0.164 | 0.121 | |
| Long Term Debt To Capital Ratio | 0.065 | 0.096 | 0.130 | 0.148 | 0.104 | |
| Financial Leverage Ratio | 1.616 | 1.629 | 1.796 | 1.643 | 1.678 | |
| Working Capital Turnover Ratio | 3.382 | 4.116 | 3.402 | 3.176 | 3.580 | |
| Operating Cash Flow Ratio | 0.998 | 0.344 | 0.483 | -0.564 | 0.656 | |
| Operating Cash Flow Sales Ratio | 0.153 | 0.066 | 0.130 | -0.126 | 0.180 | |
| Free Cash Flow Operating Cash Flow Ratio | 0.347 | -0.203 | 0.352 | 1.434 | 0.412 | |
| Debt Service Coverage Ratio | 17.890 | 11.890 | 3.847 | 4.501 | 15.998 | |
| Interest Coverage Ratio | 75.529 | 42.853 | 4.384 | 3.285 | 32.463 | |
| Short Term Operating Cash Flow Coverage Ratio | 22.069 | 7.839 | 12.157 | -10.249 | 19.753 | |
| Operating Cash Flow Coverage Ratio | 3.152 | 0.991 | 1.339 | -0.979 | 2.096 | |
| Capital Expenditure Coverage Ratio | 1.531 | 0.832 | 1.543 | -2.304 | 1.700 | |
| Dividend Paid And Capex Coverage Ratio | 1.531 | 0.832 | 1.543 | -2.304 | 1.700 | |
| Dividend Payout Ratio | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |
| Enterprise Value Multiple | 9.208 | 18.365 | 51.640 | 26.122 | 19.699 |
Sparkline shows each ratio oldest → newest (left → right).
How the latest year compares
For each ratio: its most recent value, the change versus one year earlier, and versus its 5-year average. ▲ higher ▼ lower
| Metric | Current | vs 1Y ago | vs 5Y avg |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Profit Margin | 27.9% | ▲2.4% | ▲4.2% |
| Ebit Margin | 18.5% | ▲5.7% | ▲7.5% |
| Ebitda Margin | 21.6% | ▲5.4% | ▲6.3% |
| Operating Profit Margin | 18.2% | ▲5.6% | ▲8.9% |
| Pretax Profit Margin | 18.2% | ▲5.7% | ▲7.7% |
| Continuous Operations Profit Margin | 13.4% | ▲3.6% | ▲5.2% |
| Net Profit Margin | 13.4% | ▲3.6% | ▲5.2% |
| Bottom Line Profit Margin | 13.4% | ▲3.6% | ▲5.2% |
| Current Ratio | 3.401 | ▲1.013 | ▲0.912 |
| Quick Ratio | 2.918 | ▲0.974 | ▲0.788 |
| Solvency Ratio | 0.461 | ▲0.067 | ▲0.136 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.829 | ▲0.326 | ▲0.134 |
| Price To Earnings Ratio | 15.398 | ▼-15.264 | ▼-80.296 |
| Price To Earnings Growth Ratio | 0.245 | ▲0.210 | ▲0.459 |
| Forward Price To Earnings Growth Ratio | 0.245 | ▲0.210 | ▲0.459 |
| Price To Earnings Diluted Ratio | 15.398 | ▼-15.264 | ▼-80.296 |
| Price To Earnings Diluted Growth Ratio | 0.245 | ▲0.210 | ▲0.459 |
| Price To Book Ratio | 3.550 | ▼-2.100 | ▼-1.696 |
| Price To Sales Ratio | 2.063 | ▼-0.941 | ▼-1.042 |
| Price To Free Cash Flow Ratio | 38.844 | ▲264.505 | ▲50.294 |
| Price To Operating Cash Flow Ratio | 13.480 | ▼-32.238 | ▼-5.705 |
| Debt To Assets Ratio | 0.052 | ▼-0.025 | ▼-0.033 |
| Debt To Equity Ratio | 0.084 | ▼-0.041 | ▼-0.059 |
| Debt To Capital Ratio | 0.077 | ▼-0.034 | ▼-0.046 |
| Long Term Debt To Capital Ratio | 0.065 | ▼-0.031 | ▼-0.043 |
| Financial Leverage Ratio | 1.615 | ▼-0.013 | ▼-0.057 |
| Working Capital Turnover Ratio | 3.382 | ▼-0.734 | ▼-0.149 |
| Operating Cash Flow Ratio | 0.998 | ▲0.654 | ▲0.615 |
| Operating Cash Flow Sales Ratio | 0.153 | ▲0.087 | ▲0.073 |
| Free Cash Flow Operating Cash Flow Ratio | 0.347 | ▲0.550 | ▼-0.121 |
| Debt Service Coverage Ratio | 17.890 | ▲6.000 | ▲7.065 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio | 75.529 | ▲32.676 | ▲43.826 |
| Short Term Operating Cash Flow Coverage Ratio | 22.069 | ▲14.230 | ▲11.755 |
| Operating Cash Flow Coverage Ratio | 3.152 | ▲2.161 | ▲1.832 |
| Capital Expenditure Coverage Ratio | 1.532 | ▲0.700 | ▲0.871 |
| Dividend Paid And Capex Coverage Ratio | 1.532 | ▲0.700 | ▲0.871 |
| Dividend Payout Ratio | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Enterprise Value Multiple | 9.208 | ▼-9.157 | ▼-15.798 |
Key metrics
| Metric | Trend | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $192.8M | $235.8M | $207.7M | $107.3M | $244.6M | |
| Enterprise value | $185.4M | $233.5M | $204.3M | $107.0M | $235.5M | |
| EV / Sales | 1.98x | 2.97x | 3.43x | 2.13x | 4.65x | |
| EV / Op. cash flow | 12.97x | 45.26x | 26.42x | -16.90x | 25.80x | |
| EV / Free cash flow | 37.36x | -223.42x | 75.05x | -11.78x | 62.65x | |
| EV / EBITDA | 9.21x | 18.36x | 51.64x | 26.12x | 19.70x | |
| Net debt / EBITDA | -0.36x | -0.18x | -0.86x | -0.06x | -0.76x | |
| Current ratio | 3.40x | 2.39x | 2.08x | 2.58x | 2.00x | |
| Income quality | 1.14x | 0.67x | 9.73x | -7.92x | 1.21x | |
| Graham number | $23 | $16 | $5 | $5 | $14 | |
| Graham net-net | $1 | $0 | -$0 | $0 | $0 | |
| Tax burden | 73.5% | 78.2% | 60.1% | 84.7% | 83.2% | |
| Interest burden | 98.7% | 97.7% | 83.8% | 78.4% | 98.0% | |
| Working capital | $34.4M | $20.8M | $17.3M | $17.7M | $13.8M | |
| Invested capital | $72.9M | $52.5M | $45.0M | $42.8M | $35.8M | |
| Return on assets | 14.3% | 11.3% | 1.3% | 1.5% | 14.2% | |
| Operating ROA | 21.8% | 15.3% | 1.9% | 1.6% | 12.4% | |
| Return on tangible assets | 14.3% | 11.3% | 1.3% | 1.5% | 14.2% | |
| Return on equity | 23.0% | 18.4% | 2.3% | 2.4% | 23.8% | |
| Return on invested capital | 16.9% | 14.4% | 1.5% | 1.7% | 12.9% | |
| Return on capital employed | 23.2% | 18.7% | 2.5% | 2.0% | 15.7% | |
| Earnings yield | 6.5% | 3.3% | 0.4% | 0.7% | 3.1% | |
| Free cash flow yield | 2.6% | -0.4% | 1.3% | -8.5% | 1.5% | |
| Capex / Op. cash flow | 65.3% | 120.3% | 64.8% | -43.4% | 58.8% | |
| Capex / Depreciation | 323.4% | 232.8% | 208.8% | 95.4% | 200.9% | |
| Capex / Sales | 10.0% | 7.9% | 8.4% | 5.5% | 10.6% | |
| SG&A / Sales | 9.7% | 12.9% | 16.0% | 17.2% | 16.3% | |
| R&D / Sales | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
| Stock comp / Sales | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.6% | 1.0% | 1.0% | |
| Intangibles / Total assets | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
| Days sales outstanding | 111d | 97d | 109d | 129d | 78d | |
| Days payables outstanding | 30d | 30d | 55d | 52d | 21d | |
| Operating cycle | 148d | 138d | 147d | 163d | 107d | |
| Cash conversion cycle | 119d | 109d | 92d | 111d | 86d |
Change by theme
Grouped by what each metric measures. Each figure is the change over the period shown — ▲ up ▼ down versus then.
Change over 1 year
Change over 5 years
Employee count
Peer market caps
Recent news
- 2026-09-04 Baron SMID Cap ETF Q2 2026 Portfolio Activity During the quarter, we initiated a position in Advanced Drainage Systems, the leading U.S. manufacturer of stormwater and onsite wastewater management products. We view Axon Enterprise as a market leading "atoms plus electrons" software provider with huge competitive moats. We sold the HeartFlow position in the quarter as we grew incrementally more concerned with the presence of competitors on the market.
- 2026-09-02 How PRFZ Uses Fundamental Indexing in Today''s SMID-Cap Market Thus far in 2026, small-caps have come back in a big way. As mega-cap tech concentration continues to push broad U.S. market valuations to the brink of historical highs, investors are seeking alternative paths for growth, and small-caps are offering attractive entry points.
- 2026-09-01 SMID Q2 Earnings Drop Y/Y on Tough Barrier Project Comparison Smith-Midland''s Q2 revenues and earnings decline y/y on a tough year-ago barrier comparison, while backlog rises and data-center and infrastructure demand remain firm.
- 2026-08-31 Comparing Federal Screw Works (OTCMKTS:FSCR) and Smith-Midland (NASDAQ:SMID) Federal Screw Works (OTCMKTS:FSCR - Get Free Report) and Smith-Midland (NASDAQ: SMID - Get Free Report) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends and profitability. Profitability This table compares Federal Screw Works
- 2026-08-29 Smith-Midland Targets $100M Backlog as Barrier Rentals, Data Centers Drive Growth Smith-Midland (NASDAQ: SMID) outlined growth opportunities in highway safety barriers, infrastructure construction, utility projects and prefabricated building systems during a company presentation led by Chief Executive Officer Ashley Smith and Chief Financial Officer Dominic Hunter. Smith said the company, founded on his grandfather''s family farm in 1960, produces proprietary and generic precast concrete products through facilities
- 2026-08-29 Smith-Midland Targets $100M Backlog as Barrier Rentals, Data Centers Drive Growth Smith-Midland NASDAQ: SMID outlined growth opportunities in highway safety barriers, infrastructure construction, utility projects and prefabricated building systems during a company presentation led by Chief Executive Officer Ashley Smith and Chief Financial Officer Dominic Hunter.
- 2026-08-26 Smith-Midland Awarded $2.2M SlenderWall(R) Coast Guard Project MIDLAND, VA / ACCESS Newswire / August 26, 2026 / Smith-Midland Corporation (NASDAQ:SMID), a leading manufacturer of innovative precast concrete products for transportation, infrastructure, and building construction, has been awarded a $2.2 million contract to manufacture and supply its SlenderWall® architectural precast wall system for the new U.S. Coast Guard Clinic and Visitors Center in Charleston, South Carolina, further expanding the company''s portfolio of mission-critical government and military construction projects. The contract further strengthens Smith-Midland''s position in the architectural precast market and demonstrates demand for SlenderWall® on complex institutional and government projects.
- 2026-08-22 RNIN: Outperforming SMID Play With A GARP Tilt Worth Shortlisting I initiate coverage of the Bushido Capital US SMID Cap Equity ETF with a Hold rating. With 80 equities in the basket, IT-heavy RNIN sports a strong factor mix with a GARP tilt and decent quality, which welcomes a constructive stance. Since its inception, RNIN has been doing excellently, beating the market proxied with IVV, as well as IJR, IJH, IWM, and a few other prominent names.
- 2026-08-20 Smith-Midland to Present at August 2026 Midwest IDEAS Conference MIDLAND, VA / ACCESS Newswire / August 20, 2026 / Smith-Midland Corporation (NASDAQ:SMID), a provider of innovative, high-quality proprietary and patented precast concrete products and systems, today announced management will present at the Midwest IDEAS Investor Conference on Thursday, August 27, 2026 in Chicago, IL. The company''s presentation is scheduled to begin at 11:15am CT and a webcast can be accessed through the conference host''s main website: https://www.threepartadvisors.com/midwest Qualified investors interested in participating or learning more about the IDEAS conferences, please contact Lacey Wesley at (817) 769 -2373 or [email protected].
- 2026-08-14 Smith-Midland Reports Second Quarter 2026 Financial Results Company Reports Increasing Backlog to $57.4 Million MIDLAND, VA / ACCESS Newswire / August 14, 2026 / Smith-Midland Corporation (NASDAQ:SMID), a provider of innovative, high-quality proprietary and patented precast concrete products and systems, today announced its second quarter results for the period ended June 30, 2026. Second Quarter 2026 Summary (compared to prior-year second quarter) Revenue of $23.4 million compared to $26.2 million Gross Profit of $5.4 million compared to $7.8 million Operating income of $2.0 million compared to $5.5 million Net income of $1.4 million, or $0.26 per diluted share, compared to $4.2 million and $0.79 Announcements Subsequent to end of Second Quarter Secured $10 Million contract for I-81 project with Virginia Department Of Transportation Awarded $1.7 Million data center project in Louisiana Producing nearly $1 million in utility vaults for a data center project in Virginia "Our second quarter results benefited from tailwinds related to the ongoing barrier replacement cycle and continued demand for data centers, although total revenue and net income were lower due to a challenging comparison from last year''s large special barrier project," said Ashley Smith, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Smith-Midland.